March 2026 ACCA Exams Results

Discuss the March results, paper by paper. See the discussion →

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for the June 2026 exams. Get the discount code →

nabya

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 3 posts – 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #598544
    Avatarnabya
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3

    @sirhanj, yes correct but then what was required to be ticked was relating to the 15000 amount so this was not material according to me because 12000 was a separate balance and this was a separate balance.Thus they were two different balances, we cannot combine both of them together and check materiality. Since 25000 was not financial statement level materiality.

    #598519
    Avatarnabya
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3

    Hi @sirhanj,
    What I feel is- about this question. Since i got the same question in exam.
    There were two amounts you are right. But then we were testing them individually and comparing with the set limit which is 25000. I guess. So 13000 was different and 12000 was different . And these were two different balances to be tested and compared with the set materiality. So since 12000 is less than the 25000,hence not material.

    #586180
    Avatarnabya
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3

    Is there anyone who appeared TX – UK on 15th September. How was the paper for you?

Viewing 3 posts – 1 through 3 (of 3 total)

Announcement

June 2026 exam prep is live

All updated notes, lectures and tests are now available for the June 2026 sitting. Start studying →