March 2026 ACCA Exams Results

Discuss the March results, paper by paper. See the discussion →

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for the June 2026 exams. Get the discount code →

mufakir

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 19 posts – 1 through 19 (of 19 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #174898
    Avatarmufakir
    Member
    • Topics: 8
    • Replies: 20

    right you are. for consortium the company needs to own less than 75%. not equal to or less than, but less than. so it wasn’t a consortium. and there goes another few marks. this forum is damaging to my health right now :/ i am down to 81/100 right now from all the mistakes i think i’ve definitely made. so that leaves me 30 marks for mistakes i am in the dark about. i think this paper’s going to be a tight squeeze if i pass. just gonna pray now 😀

    #174890
    Avatarmufakir
    Member
    • Topics: 8
    • Replies: 20

    because it was a machine? and machines depreciate?

    #174889
    Avatarmufakir
    Member
    • Topics: 8
    • Replies: 20

    how was it a depreciating asset btw?

    #174882
    Avatarmufakir
    Member
    • Topics: 8
    • Replies: 20

    so missed out close company. another 2.5 gone 😀

    #174871
    Avatarmufakir
    Member
    • Topics: 8
    • Replies: 20

    All in all it was a strange exam.

    In Q1, I think I did okay enough but I’m not sure. I got different IT liabilities for the two different types of disposals but the same CGT liability for both which is worrying me because that’s weird. But I structured it well enough so hopefully I’ll get some marks there. In the first disposal scenario the basis period was the cessation period and the year before the cessation period and I relieved the 6000 equipment bought against AIA and I’m not sure whether I should have done that or not.

    b) of the question wasn’t too bad. Before 2015, BPR applied, afterwards, it didn’t but taper relief came into play.

    Q2. I completely missed out on the SSE exemption even though I knew the rules full well! I did manage to latch on to the consortium bit but then I missed out on the 17% for the 6 months and 5% for the next 6 months. For the newly acquired subsidiary my profit was 31200 or 32100 or something. I think it was acquired on Dec 1.

    Since I missed out on the SSE, part b sucked. Didn’t attempt it. Didn’t even spend time on it which was a good thing cause as it turned out I was really short on time.

    Part c) was easy enough. Ethics blah blah and some procedure.

    Attempted Q3 and Q5.

    Q3 a) It qualified for the scheme but the genius that I am I laid down the conditions, stated that the conditions were being satisfied and then said it was not qualifying for the scheme. shoot me.

    The rest of the Q3 wasn’t too bad.

    Q5. Can anyone tell me if there was some trick to the roll over on the machine or was it straight forward? Cause I have a feeling that there was something to it that I missed.

    last part was the beneficial interest thing. It’s a taxable benefit for the employee but what about the company? I deducted it from interest income 😀

    Before I went through the posts, I had lost 12.5 marks. but now with the SSE thing that I missed and the 17% and then 5%, I think I may have lost some more.

    Just hope I get 50. I’ve already failed this once at 49 :/

    #169908
    Avatarmufakir
    Member
    • Topics: 8
    • Replies: 20

    Is this topic still live? I had a question regarding PPR. What happens to the annual exemption allowance?

    #169675
    Avatarmufakir
    Member
    • Topics: 8
    • Replies: 20

    the central theme for p6 (tip btw) is if u forget a law or a rule, do whatever makes the tax liability greater 😀

    has worked for me so far wherever I forget a rule.

    #116166
    Avatarmufakir
    Member
    • Topics: 8
    • Replies: 20

    @lindacarson said:
    failed 49% is it worthwhile getting an administrative review?

    No, it’s not. In my last attempt I failed p6 at 49. That was my final exam and I researched the administrative review thoroughly. All the research lead me to believe that there’s only a 2-3% chance of the original mark being changed in favor of the candidate. Even then I was like it’s worth a chance so I went ahead with the review. The result didn’t change. There are two problems with the review in your case. One is that you got 49. They give a very special and extra look to the “49” cases. If it had been 47 or 46, you would have had a better chance with the review because there were more chances of a mistake occurring but at 49, knowing how crucial that one mark is for the candidate, they take extra precaution and therefore less chance of a fail changing to a pass. Secondly, the review is just a recounting of the marks that have been assigned not a conceptual recheck of the paper.

    Having said that, except for the potential loss of 79 or so pounds, no harm in trying. Good luck.

    #110323
    Avatarmufakir
    Member
    • Topics: 8
    • Replies: 20

    thank you so much! 🙂 much appreciated. i also learnt that one should read the entire question. I didn’t read the full question so missed out on the whole 365 days thing 🙂 but thank you once again.

    #110159
    Avatarmufakir
    Member
    • Topics: 8
    • Replies: 20

    angryhamtaro, can you please check out my post and reply if you can? I can’t seem to figure out how the revenue was calculated 🙂 nor the budgeted variable costs..

    #103601
    Avatarmufakir
    Member
    • Topics: 8
    • Replies: 20

    i got 49! It was my last paper!!! I would have bloody well qualified as a member!! my work experience was done! ARGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!

    Administrative Review. Any thoughts please? Has it EVER happened that someone opted for the administrative review and their mark increased by 1? EVER?

    #100944
    Avatarmufakir
    Member
    • Topics: 8
    • Replies: 20

    I don’t think there was APR for the farmland. At the time of gift it was farmed by the tenants and the conditions for APR are that if it’s being farmed by tenants then the minimum qualification period is 7 years. If it’s owned and farmed by the owner, then the minimum period is 2 years.

    #100923
    Avatarmufakir
    Member
    • Topics: 8
    • Replies: 20

    in question 1 i don’t think there was any double taxation relief because i don’t think there was any double taxation at all. that was the clause.

    i screwed up the nic calculation. i deducted personal allowances from the income and then calculated nic on the remainder 🙂

    #77124
    Avatarmufakir
    Member
    • Topics: 8
    • Replies: 20

    why don’t u guys come down to LHR and we can study here ? 😀

    #77930
    Avatarmufakir
    Member
    • Topics: 8
    • Replies: 20

    i think i’m going to fail though 🙁

    #77929
    Avatarmufakir
    Member
    • Topics: 8
    • Replies: 20

    i can’t even login to my acca. been trying since morning and can’t get through! acca should really do something about this! divide up the servers or something!

    #71466
    Avatarmufakir
    Member
    • Topics: 8
    • Replies: 20

    well, what I’m going to do is I’ll study the opentuition notes, notes that a friend of mine gave me. That should take a day at the max and then spend the rest of the time reading, not attempting, but just reading the study guide. I have an F8 exam today so I’ve been preparing for that and STILL haven’t touched P1. Gonna start P1 after my exam today. So let’s see. Pray for me man 😀

    #70401
    Avatarmufakir
    Member
    • Topics: 8
    • Replies: 20

    Thanks swgiant! I appreciate the tips! you rock 😀

    #63728
    Avatarmufakir
    Member
    • Topics: 8
    • Replies: 20

    i think it might be a mistake,i got stuck on the same question and there doesn’t seem to be any logic behind his answer.

Viewing 19 posts – 1 through 19 (of 19 total)

Announcement

June 2026 exam prep is live

All updated notes, lectures and tests are now available for the June 2026 sitting. Start studying →