Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- December 4, 2017 at 9:12 pm #420414
Really time pressured hadn’t time to think to respond to requirements properly. Q1 ROMM – i am assuming there was about 8 risks possibly more. The ones i identified although they may not be correct were impairment of brand as revenues decreasing with lower sale items. Ifrs 15 revenue ias 2 consignment stock. Goodwill calculation..possibly no nci and contingent consideration. Eliminate Intercompany bals possibly. Internally generated brand was not shown i assume this is shown in p and l in prior year ???
December 10, 2015 at 8:33 pm #290618When a relief did come up, it wasn’t straightforward.intangible asset another booby trap
December 10, 2015 at 8:26 pm #290609Skip a generation? Habitual gifts? Probably on the wrong track
December 10, 2015 at 8:19 pm #290600Residency rules, remittance basis, groups, losses, IHT, CGT, Vat. Not tested in detail if at all. 100’s of pages. Instead slithers of the syllabus tested in detail. Examiner trying to be too clever here I feel. Pensions, seis and Incorporation relief accounted for close to 40 per cent ridiculous
December 10, 2015 at 3:54 pm #290336A complete disaster. Expected more CGT, IHT and groups. Missed pensions, EIS, Incorporation relief.
December 8, 2015 at 6:54 pm #289275Hi, yes he would have held 10% for 12 months in the previous 2 years. If he delays he would not hold10 % for 12months in the previous 2 years
December 9, 2013 at 6:10 pm #151880Re: Q2 there was little calculation in June suppose they have rectified that now but 25 marks obscure.
December 9, 2013 at 5:48 pm #151870I guess PEST could be used as well as there were a few political aspects with government influences and technological implications (internet) and economically there was more disposal income.
December 9, 2013 at 5:42 pm #151866Thanks Pendlebury,
Applied this acceptability in part b and risk, all over the place oh well!
December 9, 2013 at 5:32 pm #151861Thank you Nevyana, which model(s) do you think are applicable in this part?
December 9, 2013 at 5:15 pm #151845Can anyone remember part a’s requirement? Could a SWOT analysis have been used?
December 9, 2013 at 5:09 pm #151840Q1 unsure of part a) guessing I should have used PESTEL perhaps but applied this to suitability in part b?
Time pressured overall but could have been worse.
- AuthorPosts